<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> 
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/">
<channel rdf:about="http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24">
	<title>Wiki macro \{code\} does not format properly</title>
	<description><![CDATA[If I try to format Java code with \{code\} in a wiki, there are several issues:
- C++ style comments (//) are not colored
- C style comments (/* */) are not colored
- JavaDoc style comments (/** */) are not colored
- strings within a comment are formated as code e.g. for is bold blue, "any string" is green
- the array operator \[\] is interpreted as link to a platform resource, e.g. main(String\[\] args), is displayed as some reference (you need to escape it (\[\]), but then you need to modify the code
- otherwise the formating is primitive, but helpful
- would be cool, if it would be some eclipse style syntax highlighting for java]]></description>
	<link>http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24</link>
	<items>
		<rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24/4e95bbddc0a8001e00de97848930fdac" />
		<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24/4e93739fc0a8001e0180987225f3ba04" />
		<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24/4e8f115ec0a8001e012db3c1a28c27cf" />
		<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24/4e81d0cdc0a8001e00156e3f83cfb1c8" />
		</rdf:Seq>
	</items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24/4e95bbddc0a8001e00de97848930fdac">
		<title>Comment of : Wiki macro \{code\} does not format properly</title>
		<link>http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24/4e95bbddc0a8001e00de97848930fdac</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastien Jourdain</dc:creator>
		<dc:date>2006-01-11T12:23:26+01:00</dc:date>
		<description><![CDATA[A solution is that we do not try to find platform links between &#123;code&#125; &#8230;]]></description>
</item><item rdf:about="http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24/4e93739fc0a8001e0180987225f3ba04">
		<title>Comment of : Wiki macro \{code\} does not format properly</title>
		<link>http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24/4e93739fc0a8001e0180987225f3ba04</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastien Jourdain</dc:creator>
		<dc:date>2006-01-11T12:23:26+01:00</dc:date>
		<description><![CDATA[Formating test
<div class="code"><pre>// Comment with <span class="java&#45;object">double</span> //
/&#42; Basic C comment &#42;/
/&#42;&#42; JavaDoc comment &#42;/</pre></div>]]></description>
</item><item rdf:about="http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24/4e8f115ec0a8001e012db3c1a28c27cf">
		<title>Comment of : Wiki macro \{code\} does not format properly</title>
		<link>http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24/4e8f115ec0a8001e012db3c1a28c27cf</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastien Jourdain</dc:creator>
		<dc:date>2006-01-11T12:23:26+01:00</dc:date>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't worry it's ok&#8230; ;-)<p class="paragraph"/>Artenum Team]]></description>
</item><item rdf:about="http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24/4e81d0cdc0a8001e00156e3f83cfb1c8">
		<title>Comment of : Wiki macro {code} does not format properly</title>
		<link>http://dev.libresource.org/home/development/bug/4e7f03acc0a8001e012718a97c769e24/4e81d0cdc0a8001e00156e3f83cfb1c8</link>
		<dc:creator>Rüdiger Lincke</dc:creator>
		<dc:date>2006-01-11T12:23:26+01:00</dc:date>
		<description><![CDATA[sorry for messing up this, I should have been escaping all these things, I guess. Could somebody please edit this bug report, I cant.
maybe it is not good to have the wiki engine running everywhere? but on the other side it has additional possibilites.]]></description>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>